Real Wealth Society

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Thinking about petitions By Fred Cederholm

Column for on/after October 21st, 2007


I’ve been thinking about petitions. Actually I’ve been thinking about responsibilities, RSSV, issues, forums, The League of Women Voters, and immigration. We are so fortunate to live in a country whose system of government is a democratic republic where “the active and informed people” rule themselves via a free selection of their elected representatives. THAT, in a nutshell, WAS the intention of the founding fathers as detailed by the US Constitution and solidified by the first ten amendments to it. These reiterate our inalienable freedoms which are known as the “Bill of Rights.” This system only works if an informed citizenry actively participates in an “open and above board” election process.



You see there is far more involved to the election process than showing up on the final Election Day and casting a ballot. The true process begins much earlier and encompasses several steps. First, the prospective voter must register (R) to vote in their respective district. This can be accomplished at a number of locations – in a number of ways. Next, the voter needs to inform themselves about the candidates running and how they stand on the issues facing their nation, their state, and their district. They must then select (S) which candidates they will choose to support (S) in the election process. Finally they must vote (V) in the elections – the primary elections AND the general elections. Truly responsible voters participate in all four steps. They RSSV – if you will.



Last week I completed my biennial ritual of circulating petitions to get the candidates I support for State Representative, State Senator, and US Congressman of my district on the primary ballot for next February. These are fine individuals who work hard to serve their constituents. All are well known and getting a hundred or so signatures for each was not a problem. I and the signatories I acquired were comfortable knowing where each of these public servants stand on the issues. We may not agree with them 100%, but we are comfortable in our overall evaluation of their records and performance. If only such were the case for us for those seeking the office of the presidency in 2008?



The race for the Oval Office began what already seems like an eternity ago. As a political, a financial-economic, and a news junkie, I really try to educate myself, but I presently find myself under-whelmed by the majority of the candidates. How is it possible for seeming intelligent individuals to speak so often, yet say so very little? This is no accident! If you have been watching the debates thus far (or read transcripts of the questions and answers), you experience the sorry reality show of “Dancing with the Politicians” that now characterizes the perversion of our presidential election process.



This country is in trouble. It needs turnaround executive leadership. Our finances are a mess. Our reputation in the global community of nations stinks. Our currency continues to test new lows. We are embroiled in foreign conflicts with no end in sight. Our borders leak illegal aliens like sieves. Our families are struggling as more and more households find themselves with too much month left at the end of the money. We are dependant on foreign entities for our energy, our products, and our financing.



We owe it to ourselves (and future generations) to be informed about where we actually are, what our options are, what will be the costs and implications, and who will lead us in the much needed turnarounds. The League of Women Voters is a fine organization who serves in the quest to inform the public about the candidates and the hot button issues in fair and non-partisan arena. The Rochelle Area Chapter conducts ten forums a year which are open to the general public as well as the membership.



This Thursday, October 25th at 6:00 PM; there will be forum in the VIA Room of the First National Bank at the May Mart Shopping Plaza which will focus on immigration. The materials for the discussion in developing our local consensus (to be submitted to the national organization in December) are simply excellent. I heartily encourage interested parties to join us, or go to the www.lwv.org website. I’m Fred Cederholm and I’ve been thinking. You should be thinking, too.



Copyright 2007 Questions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Thinking about “the Prize By Fred Cederholm

Column for on/after October 14th, 2007



I’ve been thinking about “the Prize.” Actually I’ve been thinking about Alfred Nobel, dynamite, selections, global warming, and controversy. Last Friday we learned that “former next President” Al Gore was sharing the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the tax free $1.5 MILLION honoria of this prize was to be split 50/50. Al Gore’s half would be donated to further the work of his think-tank foundation, Alliance for Climate Protection, of Palo Alto, California. International debate regarding this 2007 selection began almost immediately.



You see Alfred Bernhard Nobel (1833 – 1896) was a Swedish chemist, engineer, and innovator. While Nobel was ultimately the holder of over 350 patents, he is most widely known for his fascination with explosives as the “inventor” of dynamite. He discovered how the highly volatile compound of nitroglycerine could be stabilized by combining it with diatomaceous earth (and sawdust). He patented dynamite in 1867. In a later invention, he combined nitroglycerine with gun cotton and created the even more explosive gelignite – blasting gelatin - which was patented in 1876. Whether these explosive creations were invented solely for the peaceful uses of road, bridge, tunnel construction, or quarrying is open to some question as Nobel also bought the Borfors Iron Works in 1894 and was instrumental in transforming it into the major cannon maker of its day.



Nobel’s inventions made him both very wealthy and highly controversial. An erroneous obituary in 1888 (8 years before his actual death) dubbed him as “the merchant of death who enriched himself by finding more ways to kill more people faster than ever before.” This apparently had a devastatingly psychological impact on him because he re-wrote his will in 1895, setting aside the bulk of his estate to establish the Prizes which were to be awarded annually without distinction of nationality. Three prizes were designated for achievement in the physical sciences, chemistry, and medicine/ physiology; a fourth was designated for literary work “in an ideal direction,” and the fifth was designated for the person (or society) that renders the greatest service to the cause of international fraternity – the Peace Prize.



The method of selection was laid down in the will of this then millionaire inventor of dynamite. While the other Nobel Prize winners are selected by committees of experts in the respective/ various fields, and are announced in Stockholm; the recipient of the Peace Prize is picked by a five member committee chosen by the Norwegian parliament and is announced in Oslo. Prizes awarded to leading scientists, and literary figures are generally given to recipients being honored for an entire career (or a signal achievement) which have stood the test of time. Choosing the recipient of the Peace Prize, however, has become a major political event. All the selections clearly reflect a European frame of reference (and point of view) of what is currently important in the broader scheme of things. Who should be singled out for acknowledgement and the high honor reflects a Scandinavian/ European bias.



We Americans should be content that one of our own countrymen was singled out for honor and recognition this year. Whether one personally subscribes to the theories that “global warming” is the basis for our devolving climate changes is not the issue – THAT the ecosystems of this lush little “blue planet” are delicate, and are in danger of being forever damaged by our current behaviors, IS the issue!



Controversy is nothing new to the Nobel Prizes, it happens every year when the awards are announced in Stockholm and in Oslo. There are political implications anytime someone is selected for global acknowledgement of their work and achievements. The same can also be said for all (or any) significant awards and prizes which are given out across the planet. Jealousy is a human characteristic. While hosting the Oscar Awards one year, comedian Bob Hope surveyed the audience and said: “I know what is going through your heads; Please God, if it can’t be me, don’t let it be …” Mumblings and grumblings begin as soon as we hear: “May I have the envelope, please.” It’s the same way with the Nobel Prizes. I’m Fred Cederholm and I’ve been thinking. You should be thinking, too.



Copyright 2007 Questions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Depression, debt implosion, gold, and prosperity By: John Lee

Deflation and Depression theories debunked

Through the years I have read a multitude of articles and books with one extreme point of view or another regarding impending economic doom. Everything from impending goldilocks prosperity to imminent 1930s depression is floating around in bookstores these days.

The deflationists argue that when debt is issued at increasing levels, there comes a point when we cannot service the debt, and eventually resort to selling everything we have – bonds, stocks, houses, cars – to raise dollars to pay debt. In this scenario, deflation occurs as money aggregates shrink by debt repayments, people hold off purchases knowing goods will get cheaper, and workers will be laid off as there is no demand.

Five years ago when Dow was 8,000, I talked to Mr. Ian Gordon, who based his 1,000 Dow target on this deflation premise. Buy gold, he says, because it’s the ultimate money during times of world depression and deflation.

Well, he was wrong on the Dow. But he was right on gold, for the wrong reason. Gold rises in tandem with rising fear of price inflation, not fear of deflation. Gold and deflation simply do not go together. Why would you buy gold when your dollar is appreciating in value?

Deflationists and Depressionists are often the same bunch. They eagerly anticipate some specific back-breaking straw, an event that triggers the debt implosion, with the world blown back to stone ages and streets filled with riots and violence. I like to bring up two contrarian points to this view:

1. The worst possible event that could trigger debt implosion has already occurred, with demand for the multi-trillion US mortgage debt market suddenly and completely dried up. Yet the world has gone on with business as usual.

In the last four weeks, we have witnessed the worst financial event in the US over the last 50 years. The subprime mess shook the US financial system to the core, as it directly affected the marketability of the $30 trillion+ US debt market.

.

Would you touch beef (US debts) again knowing there is a significant quantity of mad cow disease (subprime) going around?

The significance of this dwarfs the recent events of 9/11, LTCM, the dot.com bubble burst or the more distant events of the 1987 crash and the 1970s oil embargos.

To avoid the default of 10 million households and the systemic collapse of major banks such as Countrywide, The Fed and US government had no choice but to bail out.

a. For lenders and investors, central banks are lending unlimited amount of money to troubled outfits on renewable terms with faulty mortgages as collateral. Fannie May and Freddie Mac are buying increase mortgage purchase to troubled outfits.

b. For borrowers, Mr. Bush is working with banks and set to “forgive” certain amount of mortgages. The Fed is lowering interest rates to lessen the burden despite oil and commodities prices reaching all time high.

Investors see such inevitable and destructive path for the dollar and it should be no surprise that gold has broken through $730 and oil has reached a new high at $83.

2. Debt is a man-made virtual feature with limited, localized effect.

Can you honestly see Safeway running out of food or corporate America such as McDonalds or 3M stop growing? The world is forever going forwards, not backwards. Remember debts are man-made features, existing in a virtual world, serving to facilitate the transfer of ownership of real assets. While debt implosion may cause localized social instability, the disruption does not affect technological or intellectual capacities, or the existence of hard assets. All the houses, cars, planes, and technologies are still here regardless of the fate of the dollar.

What I am saying is, people outside of US hardly noticed any difference with the US debt implosion taking place in full view. I was in Thailand for a three day break and the immigration lines at the airport where full of mainland Chinese. What subprime problem so they say.

In my view, the dollar losing its reigning status would affect the global economy mildly and swiftly, as the loss of purchasing power by the dollar merely facilitate transfer of wealth of dollar holders to other fiat currency holders, and the owner of hard assets. If the party has to end for the dollar, it just means that the party is starting somewhere else.

Co-existence of Prosperity and Gold’s rising popularity?

The topic linking gold to prosperity deserves a long discussion on its own. Here let me point out that Gold has risen from $250/oz to $720/oz in six years while the global economy has grown the fastest since WWII according to The Financial Times, this goes to show that a Gold bull and prosperity can happily co-exist without a doom and gloom outcome. With an increasing global middle class and ever-expanding fiat money aggregate, I don’t see the rising gold and economic trends reversing anytime soon.

John Lee, CFA

johnlee@goldmau.com

http://www.goldmau.com

John Lee is a portfolio manager at Mau Capital Management. He is a CFA
charter holder and has degrees in Economics and Engineering from Rice
University. He previously studied under Mr. James Turk, a renowned authority
on the gold market, and is specialized in investing in junior gold and
resource companies. Mr. Lee's articles are frequently cited at major
resource websites and a esteemed speaker at several major resource
conferences.


DISCLAIMER: MONEYFILES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR INVESTMENT LOSSES.
PLEASE DO YOUR OWN SEARCH BEFORE INVESTING

Some Suggestions for Ron by James Jaeger

After watching the past debates, here are some observations and suggestions to improve Ron Paul's effectiveness.

1. MODERATE THE FRANTIC PACE. Dr. Paul obviously has the big picture in his head but most others do not. In his attempt to get it all out, he comes off as frantic. If he speaks more slowly, they may give him more time to speak. If he's on less of a REACH for the audience, the debate moderators will be on less of a WITHDRAW from him and stop cutting him off so much.

2. DEFINE WORDS. Dr. Paul should offer quick definitions as he goes along. I am willing to bet the broad base of America does NOT understand even the most basic of words and terms when it comes to politics, banking and the economy. If they did, it would be an entirely different ball game. Suggested words to define below.

3. USE SOUND-BITES. Since we are in the age of instant TV, Dr. Paul needs to play the game and toss out sound bites -- especially ones that draw attention to the issues the others may be hiding or avoiding. These sound bites should be delivered in a rough sequence of conceptual understanding. If these ideas are presented in easy-to-hear-form, people will begin to wonder what the other candidates are failing to discuss. Suggested sound bites below.

4. WAVE THE MD. Since the other candidates are busy waving their unique stats, Dr. Paul should wave his MD stat more often. He might say something like: Given that I'm the only MEDICAL DOCTOR here on this stage, I feel I am the best candidate to steer us through the upcoming health-care crisis." Or he could say: "One of the first things you learn in medical school is to define your terms carefully. Maybe we should do this more often." If he wants to push it, he might say: "As the only MD on this stage, I can say this: America is sick (not well) and needs a doctor ASAP."

5. USE THE ZEITGEIST. Don't hesitate to say we are now an Empire. The mainstream public understands this fact and it's become part of the "temperament of the times." Only the politically correct or scared candidates on the debate stage don't fully get, or admit, it yet. If Dr. Paul says things like, "we are now the ROMAN EMPIRE" openly in debates, people like Rude-Ruddy will attack him. But, since the viewing public GETS that we ARE an Empire now, his attack will backfire, making him look out of date and/or withholding of information. What else is he out of date on or withholding? If Ron can get the public to see that the other candidates are out of date and/or witholdy, he can deliver the below sound-bites in a more receptive atmosphere.

6. GET CELEBRITIES INVOLVED. If at least five name celebrities come out and openly endorse Ron Paul, he will probably make it to president.

JAMES JAEGER

212/933-9374

SUGGESTED WORDS AND TERMS TO DEFINE:

Article I, Section 8 & 10

Backed currency

Balance of trade deficit

Bank

Constitution

Debt

Deficit

Democratic Party (party for the poor and newly-rich)

Dollar (a unit of weight in silver)

Exporting inflation

Fed

Federal Reserve System

Fiat currency

Fiscal policy

Fractional reserve

Free trade (not to be commingled with outsourcing of jobs)

Inflating the money supply

Inflation

Libertarian Party (party for the patriotic middle-class)

Loss of purchasing power

Monetary policy

Money supply

Monitize

NAFTA

Notes

Oath of Office

outsourcing of jobs

Printing out of thin air

Purchasing power

Redeemable

Redeemable paper

Republican Party (party for the rich)

Rising prices

Silver certificates

T-Bills

T-Bonds

Treasuries

Use the money first

wealth disparity

SUGGESTED SOUND-BITES (after fact-checking):

ALL politicians claim to lower taxes.

Politicians endlessly promise to limit government, but do they?

Is your current government smaller?

The United States earns $11 trillion per year.

The cost of governing the U.S. is $3 trillion per year.

Is a 27% government management fee okay.

GDP is $11 trillion per year.

The government borrows half a trillion dollars a year.

You pay half a trillion dollars a year in interest

Much of Congresses money comes from borrowing.

Borrowing makes banks wealthy.

Why is a bank on almost all major street corners in America?

Government doesn't NEED taxes, if it can borrow endlessly.

Government doesn't need YOU if it can borrow endlessly.

Our money is no longer backed by gold.

Our money is no longer backed by silver.

Article I says the money must be backed by gold.

The Oath of Office requires the Constitution be followed.

President not enforcing Article I, is in violation of his Oath.

Most on this stage will violate their Oaths of Office.

Money is created by the Federal Reserve System.

The money is now all paper, not gold or silver.

In a crash, paper becomes worthless.

We are courting disaster.

The dollar is loosing value.

As the stock market gains value, the dollar is loosing it.

Most Americans use DOLLARS, not STOCK certificates.

The BANKS now print up as much paper money as they want.

The Federal Reserve System is a PRIVATE BANK.

The Federal Reserve System is also known as simply: THE FED.

The FED is made up of elite bankers from Mr. Guiliani's city.

The FED literally creates money out of thin air.

You can no longer turn your paper dollars in for silver.

The elite banks have been secretly confiscating silver and gold.

There is probably no gold left in Ft. Knox.

Who took the gold from Ft Knox?

Fed-Bankers took the gold from Ft. Knox.

The Fed is a banking cartel, similar to OPEC.

The Fed has never been audited by the citizens.

Ft. Knox has not been audited in over x decades.

The Fed is an ELITE PRIVATE bank run out of New York City.

Elite private bankers now print up endless money for Congress.

Politicians promise to cut taxes because they don't NEED taxes.

Congress borrows money from the private Fed.

Borrowed money becomes the National DEBT.

The National debt is an unprecedented $9 trillion today.

The national debt is now by far the highest in history.

The national debt has in effect funded Congress.

When Congress borrows it sells Treasury-NOTES.

A NOTE is a form of DEBT.

Much of these treasury NOTES are bought by foreigners.

When Congress can't sell any more NOTES, the Fed buys them.

Where does the Fed get the money to buy NOTES, it prints it.

Why does every dollar bill now say Federal Reserve NOTE?

Every dollar used to say SILVER CERTICICATE not Fed NOTE.

The entire US money supply has been turned into DEBT, i.e. NOTES.

Congress uses DEBT to fuel its endless expansion.

We are now an Empire.

We are no longer a Republic.

We are now an empire fueled by endless Fed DEBT.

All empire eventually crash when the debt is high enough.

During Ross Perot's bid the debt was $4 trillion; IT IS NOW 9.

AGAIN, Congress doesn't NEED to tax when it can endlessly borrow.

This is why politicians rarely talk about the DEBT.

Politicians only talk about the DEFICIT.

Do you know the difference between the DEBT and the DEFICIT.

Most Americans don't know difference between DEBT and DEFICIT.

The DEBT is 9 trillion the DEFICIT is 1/2 trillion.

The DEBT is 18 times bigger than the DEFICIT.

Have any of the people on this stage made you aware of that?

Why not?

What other facts do these people here want to suppress?

What's in it for them?

Why do almost 90% of the People disapprove of Congress?

Could it be because they KNOW something is being suppressed?

We all make $11 trillion worth of stuff every year.

The government takes $3 trillion of that money from us.

The gov takes about 25% of our money every year.

State and local governments then take another 25%.

Citizens spend about half of their money for government.

Gov takes all this money AND puts us $9 trillion in debt.

Next time you look at a dollar, consider the word NOTE on it.

The FED has never been audited.

Where does the Fed get the money it lends to congress?

The Fed prints up as much money as it wants.

There is a big difference between the DEFICIT and the DEBT

The Debt has never been higher in our history.

Major CEOs make 500 times more than their employees.

Only 5% of the people in the US are in Wall Street

Wall Street is experiencing record highs.

Main Street is working at McDonalds.

The U.S. food supply is basically toxic.

Drug companies and Banks are the biggest lobbyists.

Glossary of Eco/Political Terms by James Jaeger

12 October 2007 |

Adam Smith -- The guy who figured out that you should let markets be free because an "invisible hand" will guide them in a way that will make everyone eventually happy and wealthy. His most famous book is An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations


Adam Smith's paradigm, for the most part, works well -- the idea that the free market operating under the "invisible hand" of supply and demand, will be self-regulating and promote wealth. But here's the problem with today's capitalism: the market is not free. Only goods and services are free, money is not. The cost of money is regulated by the Federal Reserve. This is a serious flaw in today's capitalism and it's what's causing the wealth disparity we now see in the U.S. Here's why:


Money represents goods and services. Money is a medium of exchange we use to transact those goods and services. The money SUPPLY, therefore, must bear a close resemblance to the SUPPLY of goods and services in the economy. When these get out of whack, there is either too much money or too little money with respect to the products and services in the economy. Too much money and the price of products and services go up. Too little money and the price of products and services go down. It's very simple.


But again, here's where capitalism, as practiced today, goes off the rails. The price of money is set by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee. This committee meets eight times a year in secrecy and sets, among other things, interest rates and reserve requirements. Interest rates are the cost of money, hence determine the demand for money. Reserve requirements set the amount of money, hence determine the supply of money. Thus, one can readily see this is NOT a free market because supply and demand, hence Adam Smith's "invisible hand," is not involved with money.


The reason this is a serious flaw is because money represents ALL the products and services in the economy. We use money to transact ALL the products and services in the economy. By REGULATING the cost and amount of money in the economy you are, in essence, regulating ALL of the economy. Thus, we live in a MANAGED capitalistic society -- not a FREE MARKET capitalistic society.


Any time the market is MANAGED, it benefits those who MANAGE it. In this case, the elite bankers connected with the Federal Reserve, Congress (the Fed's partners) and those who get the money first (all those around the beltway), such lobbyists for the military-industrial complex.


This is why we now live in a plutocracy, NOT a democracy. The beneficiaries of a managed money supply have taken over the government because only they can afford to purchase favors from Congress. Only they can afford to rewrite the laws to favor their special (corporate) interests. The citizens are now merely figure-heads.

This is why Ron Paul says the Federal Reserve System must be dealt with.

Article I, Section 8 & 10 -- The exact place in the U.S. Constitution where it says the money is supposed to be gold and silver and where it says that the government is not supposed to issue Bills of Credit.

Backed currency -- You can turn your paper dollars in for real money if you think the government is printing up too many of them.

Balance of trade deficit -- Our spending spree in places like China. We buy more from them than they buy from us.

Bank -- An institution that lends money it doesn't have, or that it steals from others through highly complex financial transactions known as "monetary policy" or the "federal reserve system."

Bills of Credit -- Federal Reserve Notes.

Bond -- An IOU that's due in so many years you forget what they're paying in interest.

Border Security -- The federal government's assurance that it will always maintain security BORDERing on just the right amount so that POOR Mexicans can come into the U.S. and eventually become POOR Democrats OR enter the U.S. and eventually become slaves in factories owned by RICH Republicans.

Conservative -- A person who doesn't want to change very much. He's on top for the most part so why change anything. A person who keeps an eye on liberals because they want to change much.

Constitution -- The Supreme Law of the Land, i.e., THIS land: the United States, not the Middle East. A document politicians refer to in an attempt to sucker voters into believing that they are still working for citizens, even though they are actually working for CORPORATE citizens for the most part.

Creating money out of thin air -- The unconstitutional action of Congress, in partnership with the Federal Reserve, issuing bonds and then "paying" for them by authorizing the Treasury to simply print up the "money."

Davos -- Where the Insiders meet to plot the takeover of the planet.

Debates -- a monthly TV show where presidential candidates stand in front of cameras and answer a sanitized range of politically-acceptable questions. The best-known candidates are always placed in the middle of the stage so they can become even better known and so we can learn as little as possible about what solutions the other candidates may offer. The high point of the Republican Debate is usually when Rude-Rudy tries to chew off Ron-Paul's head. The high point of the Democratic Debate is when Gravel has another melt-down and starts screaming important, but hard to confront, facts at all the OTHERS on the stage.

Debt -- What Congress uses to fund endless wars, endless hand-outs and endless government expansion. What Congress uses when it doesn't want citizens to "read its lips."

Deficit -- The ADDITIONAL amount Congress takes us into DEBT each year.

Democratic Party -- Party for the poor and newly-rich. Party for those who want to "progress."

Dollar -- A unit of weight, like the pound or the ounce or the ton. A dollar is a certain weight of pure silver.

Empire -- A nation that has enough weapons and fiat money to tell the rest of the world to go to hell.

Exporting inflation -- Printing up endless watered-down Federal Reserve Notes but spending them on the endless flow of cheap products poor suckers in other countries make.

Federal Reserve System -- A government-sanctioned, quasi-private banking cartel, similar to OPEC. It's not a government agency; there are no reserves and it's a central BANK, not a system ... unless you want to consider it's a "system" that screws you very efficiently and very subtly.

Federal Reserve Open Market Committee -- The people who cut off Adam Smith's invisible hand and now use it in secrecy to "manage" the cost and amount of money as they, in their sole discretion, see fit.

Fed -- Short for Federal Reserve System.

Fiat currency -- Paper currency the government orders you to use even though it's not redeemable in gold or silver. Fiat currency currently comes in 1 dollar bills, 5 dollar bills, 10 dollar bills, 20 dollar bills, 50 dollar bills and 100 dollar bills. It says: "This is legal tender for all debts public and private" on each piece of paper. That's the government's cue that you better accept this paper or else. See FIAT EMPIRE

Fiat -- Something ordered by a government, king or dictator. By government decree.

Fiat Currency -- Money the government orders its citizens to use even though it's becoming worthless or only backed up by the "full faith and credit of the U.S."

FIAT EMPIRE -- A movie that explains why the Federal Reserve System violates the U.S. Constitution. Stars Ron Paul, G. Edward Griffin, Edwin Vieira and Ted Baehr. See http://www.FiatEmpire.com

Fiscal policy -- Making yet more laws and tax regulations to handle previous laws and tax regulations. Controlling the economy by manipulating and imposing numerous rules and regulations in yearly spasms.

Fractional reserve banking -- The unethical basis of modern-day banking. A legalized ponzi scheme where the Fed banks get to lend out more money (or Receipts) than they have on hand, the assumption being that not everyone will come for their money (Receipts) at the same time. Fractional reserve banking, along with creating money out of thin air are the two principle ways the money supply is inflated thus causing a loss of purchasing power. Also see "Receipts".

Free -- You pay for it later.

Freedom -- The opposite of laws and regulation. Freedom = 1/Law. This means: your freedom is inversely proportionate to the number of laws in effect limiting you and your actions. Thus the only place you are almost "free" is in intergalactic space at least one hundred trillion miles away from any and all planets and galaxies. Unfortunately, even out there, you are still not free from the Law of Gravity.

Free trade -- The term people use to sucker you into believing your job will NOT be outsourced. Bankers and corporate candidates like this term because it has the word FREE in it. Makes it seem FREE!!!!

Globalization -- Converting the entire earth into one huge supermarket with billions of over-weight, pharmaceutical-dependent, dumbed-down consumers watching TV commercials in an endless craze to purchase, on credit, the next petroleum-based product offered by a half-naked woman.

Greenspan, Alan -- A nice guy who sold out to the Insiders. Alan Greenspan is the former Federal Reserve Chairman. He wrote an informative book called The Age of Turbulence that all people concerned about the Fed should (attempt) to read.

Inflating the money supply -- When the Fed prints up too many dollar bills or lowers interest rates on Bills of Credit below what Adam Smith's market would normally do.

Inflation -- As commonly used by apologists of the Federal Reserve System, the word "inflation" is a bogus, misused word intended to make you think prices are rising because of anything OTHER THAN the Federal Reserve System (or printing up too much fiat currency).

Insiders -- The people that meet at Davos.

Left Wing -- Another word for Liberal or Progressive. People who are left wing fly counter-clockwise in political circles only to find that they now live in a bigger, more suppressive collective known as the Democrats.

Liberal -- A person who wants change. He's not on top as much as he wants to be and/or he can visualize the world "progressing" in many ways, if only it wasn't so ... conservative. A person who keeps an eye on conservatives because they don't want to change much.

Libertarian Party -- The party for patriotic middle-class Americans who are fed up with the unconstitutional empire we have become as a result of putting our faith in Democrats and Republicans for too long.

Loss of purchasing power -- Why you now pay 40-cents for a stamp that used to cost 5-cents. Prices are not going UP, your dollar is going DOWN.

Military-Industrial-Complex -- More properly called the military-industrial-banking complex, this is a term coined by the late President Eisenhower when he cautioned the American People that they should be vigilant about an over-grown system of military and corporate interests who endlessly suck off the federal government and run up the debt. Don't look now but the debt is now over $9 trillion and the military-industrial-banking complex is sucking off as much as $1 trillion a year.

Monetary policy -- Manipulation of the amount and cost of money by a secret "open" market committee at the Federal Reserve Bank. Monetary policy benefits an elite insider group of bankers because it allows them to monopolize the creation and distribution of money. They get to profit from the insider knowledge this brings in places like the stock, bond, real estate and currency markets.

Money -- Gold or silver coins. Nothing else is money. Paper is NOT money. Paper with nice squiggly designs all over it still isn't money. Paper is a money SUBSTITUTE. Today we use money substitutes, not money, to transact business. Today we use TOKENS of our former silver-backed greatness to transact business.

Money supply -- The amount of dollar bills, checking accounts and savings in the economy at any given time. Also includes money (Federal Reserve Notes) the Fed prints out of thin air for Congress. Note this definition, as used by apologists of the Fed, is misleading because the MONEY supply is most certainly NOT comprised of very many gold or silver coins, as the owners of the New York Federal Reserve member banks have probably confiscated these years ago.

Monitize -- To turn something into "money." Currently we have become so perverted, we use DEBT for "money". We have "monetized" debt.

NAFTA -- A trade agreement the major corporations told Congress to put in place because they want to screw American workers out of their pay as much as possible.

NeoCon -- A Democrat in transition to becoming a Republican. A person who has been newly-rich (also known as "nouveau riche") for over 10 years and is now trying to enter the "old, conservative money" set.

New Deal, The -- The Raw Deal Franklin D. Roosevelt foisted upon the American people in order to "justify" the endless expansion of government through endless debt, endless taxation and most of all, endless spending -- mostly into the Military-Industrial Complex. The idea behind the New Deal is that the government borrows and taxes to pay for everything under the sun, moon and stars. All the citizens have to do is eat, watch TV, fight and have sex with anything that moves. The banks love it because they get to charge interest on all this excess.

Notes -- A piece of paper saying that you owe someone money. An IOU. Our money is now called Federal Reserve NOTES. Go figure.

National Debt -- The amount of money Congress and the banks have suckered out of us because we don't know the difference between the word DEBT and the word DEFICIT. For that matter, because we don't have a working knowledge of the definitions of all the words in this glossary.

Oath of Office -- The promise the President gives when he takes office to uphold the Constitution and do things such as enforce Article I, Section 8 & 10.

One-World Government -- A proposed government that will manage the entire world at least as well as the government that managed the former USSR. When a one-world government crashes, you have a zero-government world.

Osama bin Laden -- a guy who had too much religion forced on him by his mother.

Outsourcing of jobs -- A result of "free trade." Corporate stockholders, 5% of America, can earn more money because they can hire a communist slave labor force to replace you.

Politics -- the art and science of arguing or fighting over who gets what.

Printing out of thin air -- Since citizens can no longer turn in their dollar bills for silver, the Federal Reserve can print up as many paper dollar bills as it wants. It can't print silver however.

Purchasing power -- The energy that you are slowly loosing every decade as you and your children are sucked dry by the elite Federal Reserve bankers through monetary policies so complex only your 500-dollar-per-hour attorney can comprehend them. This means that, as more money is printed up, the money already in circulation gets "watered down" ... it looses it's power to purchase things. The illusion is that prices rise, when in fact, what's happening is the dollar is going down: it can't purchase as much. It takes MORE Federal Reserve Notes to buy a given product or service. Only the people that get to use the money FIRST get greater purchasing power because when they use it, it hasn't watered down the other dollars in circulation. Again, the manifestation of watered down dollars is that prices rise. Things aren't getting MORE valuable, it just takes MORE, less "powerful" Federal Reserve Notes (dollars) to purchase a given product or service. So when you see houses and stocks madly RISING in price, don't be fooled ... it's the money that's usually going DOWN in purchasing power.

Receipts -- In the old days people used gold and silver coins exclusively. When people got too rich, they found it difficult to carry all their gold and silver coins around so they left them at special secure warehouses known as banks. These banks gave them receipts to evidence the fact that the gold was in the warehouse. Eventually people started using the receipts to buy things because it was too much of a hassle to go in and get the gold or silver. These receipts evolved in to what we use as OUR money, only we now call it "paper currency". Like the Receipts of old, we USED to be able to redeem our paper currency for gold and silver. No longer, because the banks have confiscated all the gold and silver. See "Fractional Reserve".

Redeemable -- Able to get back. If you store your gold in a bank, the bank will give you a receipt to evidence your ownership. If you want to get your gold back, you will have to REDEEM it by presenting the receipt. Sometimes people use the term "backed by gold or backed by silver." The more appropriate term is "redeemable in gold or silver."

Redeemable paper -- Dollar bills, such as Silver Certificates, that you can redeem for silver. Nixon made all such Silver Certificates vanish from existence during his reign of criminality.

Republic -- A state in which supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by those citizens. The form of government the Founders established as embodied in the U.S. Constitution.

Republican Party -- The party for the rich, or people that like things the way they are because they are able to do better than their fellows. The party that used to be for limited government but now wants to take over the world.

RepubliCrats -- An emergent property of the actions of the Republican and Democratic parties is that they act like the same party with only superficial differences. This same party is the RepubliCratic Party. When once-different parties are bought and sold by THE SAME corporate interests, you eventually get THE SAME political party. This is why the Republicans have lost their way into the expansion of government and why the Democrats are not ending the War in Iraq as they promised they would.

Revolving Door -- A door your congressman uses to get back into Washington DC after you have voted him out. Many congressman become lobbyists after they have worked in government. They do this so they can make money advising major corporations on the best ways to screw the American people out of their tax dollars.

Rich, The -- People who have not trusted their government or banks for very long and now are so well off they don't WANT to change very much. Why change the very things or conditions that provided their wealth? So the mantra of the rich, or someone in power is: "put the boots on but don't walk." After a certain point, wealth builds more wealth exponentially. Einstein was known to state once that the most amazing phenomena in the universe is the principle of compound interest. Well don't look now, who has rigged the game to garner most of the compound interest ... the people and entities that can create money out of thin air and then get it working for them is minimum risk investment vehicles. When you have a hundred million dollars, you only need to get an assured 5% return on your investment in order to add a cool $5 million to your pile every year. Five million a year is enough to live comfortably, keep your pool clean, eat out every night, travel and do what you want and still add at least 3 million to the pile every year -- all with out raising a finger. Yes the wealth calculus is in their favor and you don't stand a chance under the current system.

Right Wing -- Another word for Conservative. People who are right wing fly clockwise in political circles only to find that they now live in a bigger, more suppressive collective known as the Republicans.

Rising prices -- What happens when the Federal Reserve prints up too much money, money the people in Washington and the Military-Industrial Complex get to use the money first before it looses purchasing power.

Rothschild Formula, The -- The way governments "justify" their very existence. See http://www.mecfilms.com/universe/articles/formula.htm

Silver certificates -- Dollar bills that you can turn in for a Dollar of pure silver. At the elite bankers request, Richard Nixon got rid of these because they gave the People too much power over the quality and quantity of their money supply.

T-Bills -- Pieces of paper the government issues when it borrows money from you. Also known as Treasury Bills.

T-Bonds -- More pieces of paper the government issues when it borrows money from you. Also known as Treasury Bonds.

T-Notes -- Yet MORE pieces of paper the government issues when it borrows more money from you. Also known as Treasury Notes.

Terrorism -- A military tactic used by someone or some group against an empire because they have no other way of communicating. An excuse for a government to "justify" its very existence.

Treasuries -- The term you use when you don't want to confuse people with all the kinds of paper the government uses when it wants to borrow yet more money.

Use the money first -- As the Fed prints up endless money for Congress to spend, it slowly makes all the rest of the money in our pockets turn to dust. Only those who get to "use the money first" get real value out of it. These people are, of course, the Congress as well as all the corporations in and around Washington DC who have been lobbying and sucking off the Congress for decades.

War -- The mass mental-illness societies occasionally undergo when they can't figure out who to blame for their problems.

Weapons -- Instruments of death invented, developed, financed, manufactured, distributed and used by dysfunctional psychopaths who solve problems through force rather than reason.

Wealth Calculus -- The doctrine that, under our current system, significant wealth will generate infinite wealth so long as four conditions are met: a) the investment capital is large enough, b) it is invested at a rate of return higher than the damage caused by currency inflation, c) risk has been minimized to almost zero, and d) sufficient time elapses. Just as the gravity of a massive object will eventually sweep up all surrounding objects, the "gravity" of large sums of capital will eventually sweep all other capital, whether small or large. Large sums of capital sweeping up other large sums of capital are known as mergers. The wealth calculus of any given global economic state is that eventually one entity will own all other entities and dominate all of the capital in that system.

Wealth disparity -- The difference between all the rich people out there and all the poor people out there. As the middle class becomes poorer, their wealth is absorbed by the rich. Wealth disparity is a primary manifestation of wealth calculus in operation.


http://www.mecfilms.com/universe/

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Do not react, act autonomously! by Joost van Steenis

Dear reader, this is the 92nd Letter of an Autonomous Thinker

A flea looks for a unguarded place on a human body to suck some blood. One bite is a nuisance many bites are terrible.



Humans do not look for easy places to attack but mostly react on what the elite decides. They are not autonomous.



That has to change!

I participated in the eighties in the Anti Nuclear Movement that reacted against a Dutch nuclear plant. Thousands of masspeople blockaded the plant. I took part but also proposed the slogan "The nuclear plant is everywhere!" Directors do not live in the plant, neither do scientists that make nuclear energy possible. Many firms supply the plant with food, drink and materials, dispose the nuclear waste or distribute and use nuclear energy. There is a multitude of targets that are not as well guarded as the nuclear plant.



Only sometimes "other targets" were attacked for example by sabotaging electricity supply lines or by a demonstration in front of the house of a atom physicist. Most political energy was concentrated on the nuclear plant. The result was a clash with the police and not the closing down of the plant.



Wars between indigenous masses and occupying armies are different. Nearly always the masses won. Vietnam, Indonesia, Somalia, Cuba, Nicaragua and now Afghanistan and Iraq. They fight like fleas, they attack on weak points and are not led by what the occupying army is doing. When the Americans amass troops in Baghdad, insurgents go elsewhere. I only wonder why insurgents do not expand the war to the heartland of the occupiers. There have been few attacks on weak points in Western countries. In the end the masses of the occupying countries will turn against their leaders because they cannot live anymore the life they lived before.



This is not new. Sun Tzu wrote already in the sixth century BC in "The Art of War":

"Appear at points which the enemy must hasten to defend; march swiftly to places where you are not expected".



"You can be sure of succeeding in your attacks if you only attack places which are undefended".



"So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak".

To get rid of any elite I propose the same policy. Do not react on what the elite is doing but make it impossible for elitepeople to live the safe, privileged and prosperous life they live now. Undermine the power basis of the elite and not its decisions.



The Americans did not withdraw from Vietnam because they thought that Vietnamese had the right to be independent. The decisive factor was fifty thousand dead Americans. Therefore the American masses rallied, the life they lived before was being threatened.



The same is happening in Iraq. Thousands of Westerns are dying. The tide is turning in the West – and terrorist attacks do contribute also to this change. When the war in Iraq is over Westerns will not die anymore in the Iraqi quagmire and terrorist attacks will disappear.

The rightist Dutch-Israeli war historian Martin van Creveld ("The evolution of war") is very negative about the chances of the Americans in Iraq. The French and the Americans in Vietnam, the Soviets in Afghanistan or the Dutch in Indonesia lost wars against insurgent masses. The military strongest party had to withdraw. Van Creveld did learn from the past that all wars in foreign countries are a morass in which foreigners will drown.



This historical lesson is not understood by Western activists. They do not realise that the elite can be undermined by independent attacks on weak points. Then elitepeople will realise that it will not be anymore possible to have it always better than the rest of the population.



The central point is always that actions should make life in the eliteworld less agreeable. When elitepeople realise they cannot live anymore the privileged life they lived before, they will not anymore support decisions of the top elite. Than the possibility for a world without elites will come around.



The War of the Flea takes time but the future is bright. When the number of flea pricks will increase signs of decay will appear in the eliteworld. But the present-day activists only try to improve the situation of the masses and do not attack the reason why the situation of the masses is subordinate. They do not invade the eliteworld, but only fight for improvements within the framework set by the elite.




For further ideas about the War of the Flea see Letter 32 ( http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis/letter32.htm) and letter 88 (http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis/letter88.hm).

Yours truly, Joost van Steenis

http://members.chello.nl/jsteenis

Ways to increase masspower